Skip to main content

The spark that burns

There was once a fellow crow that flew over a forest… It was ancient times and guess what stuff happens.. Yup I’ll get on with the story..’as the crow was flying over that dense green forest, the guardian of the forest(spirit of the forest) got too cocky he yelled at the crow “You ugly dark creature don’t come to these parts again… We  don’t welcome losers… take your darkness somewhere else” … then what happened? Hehe.. I’ll tell you when we conclude .



Once in a while we all make the mistake of underestimating others don’t we?. And usually the price we pay are very high  a Brocken bond, an enemy , a rival , a surprise…. The list is long. Mostly the usual trend is not the underestimating part.. but worse of its kind such as the dominating or humiliating part that sets the house on fire.. Usually people find the  luxury or ease in hiding behind their second skin of helplessness. This is to avoid a certain level of Tension ,But this doesn’t mean that they are not capable of breaking out of their illusional coffin of helplessness . The truth be told actually when that happens its never a pretty sight. Its like when a hog that had been caged for long left into a cockfight.. the sudden freedom or the fresh air fuels the beast to hit at the powerful of blows.Each thrusts drugs the beast to purely go into psycho mode to destroy everything its sets eyes upon.
Its specific ..To create a fire we never need an  Inferno , a simple little spark is enough .. But the rough truth is that a fragile little spark can ignite a thousand infernos . This time I’ll go specific on what these sparks are.. they are never the red little hot stuff that splitters when we light a matchstick.. but a little more close to ourselves . “WORDS” are the most flammable material that I have ever come across in my life. You must be thinking why I started with underestimating others and ended up in the furious flames of word? “well the words we vomit to a person , when we underestimate him is fire that’s going to power his spiritual engines for the rest of his life”. “Beware because such sparks might be the thing that’s going to set you and him on fire and push you both to the endless flames of inferno of rivalry” .

 So never doubt … just wonder how what others are capable of !
Now to the story well there are 2 possible outcomes


1.The crow went to the nearest Torch and set himself on fire , Returned to the forest, shed his burning feathers all over the place and finally fell into the inferno that coffined the Forest guardian and Burned to ashes.


2.The crow became too much depressed upon the guardians comment. His depression turned to anger,  it turned to his determination.. He flew to the farthest west ..  The snow , the heat , the wind it never stopped him.. finally he got to the place of enlightenment.. he wished to be everything the forest spirit told he never was.. to the reply the sage gave him  a mirror.. guess what he had evolved.. Now beautiful as a peacock and more elegant than any spirit the world has ever seen…” Yes the journey had evolved him to be someone he thought he never could”. Then u know what happens.. he flew over the same forest blah..Blah… Jealous.. Revenge ..its that kind of Ancient shit :p Don’t blame me …



So have nice day… Never be the spark that Burns us down

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maths the purity ! and how education just ruined it

I loved maths.. its funny that the statement i used was in past tense.. there was instances in my life when programming was introduced for me to solve maths problems.. i would write code to solve simple issues. now i am stuck being a CS student, I hate maths now..now that wen i need to learn i kept a research on how i became so distant from maths.. The main reason is that after a period of time maths stopped being creative. picture an art class (under grad) and the assignment is the following pic: you dont get to draw the lines you dont get to choose the colors.. thats the creative aspect of maths.. or in this case art.. you get my point right? This is exactly how we teach maths.. instead of colors we will have 6-10 types or shaped cutters of types. they are the exact same type of problems.. their numbers change value change.. other than that nothing else.. its the  same color by number, a person gets tired by this over time or a period of time. The problem is that.. in ord

A I - another intelligence

As the first two letters suggest the sudden impression in each of your mind was to consider the full form as artificial intelligence .each and every one of you must be pictuting a functional artificial human brain capable of handling  human logic and human intelligence. That is where the whole field of AI (artificial intelligence)  breaksdown . We are trying to copy and replicate human intelligence by computer logic and computer,quantum, electronic circuitry. Even with the innovation in quantum computing researchers are trying to copy the unknown structure and wonders of human brain and create the artificial intelligence.     We just cant predict how artificial intelligence will look like, what it will want or how it will feel about humans. We still are very far away from making it happen. Early theories on A I were based on that intelligence was pretty much located in the brain. And they had a specific type of brain in mind a computational brain. But we learned a lot about brain and

For those of you dont understand what is Computer Science Engineering

Computer science is not really about computers -- and it's not about computers in the same sense that physics is not really about particle accelerators, and biology is not about microscopes and Petri dishes...and geometry isn't really about using surveying instruments. Now the reason that we think computer science is about computers is pretty much the same reason that the Egyptians thought geometry was about surveying instruments: when some field is just getting started and you don't really understand it very well, it's very easy to confuse the essence of what you're doing with the tools that you use.Computer science... differs from physics in that it is not actually a science. It does not study natural objects. Neither is it, as you might think, mathematics; although it does use mathematical reasoning pretty extensively. Rather, computer science is like engineering; it is all about getting something to do something, rather than just dealing with abstractions, as